I’ve called a lot of people dumb. I don’t mean it when I say it, and I truly do love people. But I have labeled people that way before.
It sucks. You never want to call someone ‘slow.’ Or ‘unintelligent.’ It doesn’t go over well. Imagine you’re talking to your friend, Samantha. You’re excited about your new ‘human design’ business. You share some cool new ideas you have. Samantha’s smile feels genuine. She nods in all the right places. You leave the conversation feeling good about yourself. A week later you mention it again and Samantha has no clue what you’re talking about. She didn’t understand your new ideas, and worse, she acted as if they did. You realize she’s dumber than a sack of hammers, but you’re wise enough not to say so. You wander off, thinking that you’re smart, and she’s not. Is this a fair judgment, just from a couple of interactions? Not likely.
There’s a “love/hate” spectrum. Some people behave more lovingly, and some behave less so. There’s a “charm/repel” spectrum. Some people act more charming, and some act less so. There’s a “fame/obscurity” spectrum. Some people more ‘in the limelight’ and some are more ‘behind-the-scenes.’ There’s no point pretending spectrums of behavior don’t exist, they 100% do.
Let’s say you hop on your PC and google “intelligence.” As usual, you click a top-ranked result and start reading. What are the chances that that top-ranked result is written by the world’s truly smart people? What are the chances people on the high end of the ‘smartness spectrum’, sat down and wrote a page-one article on intelligence? Did Einstein write a Google-ranking article? Did Stephen Hawking? What I’m getting at is this:
Even if you seek out ‘peer-reviewed journals’ or recent studies, you won’t learn much. These are often disproven by another study a year later. Plus they’re often written by people who are ‘good at one thing’, but not ‘truly smart’. Hopefully, I can do better.
Let’s go.
I’m talking about Howard Gardner. He offers a theory of multiple intelligences. Some say he outlined 8 different types, others say 7, 9, or 10. He’s been quoted saying there may be more beyond his original categories. He suggests we each have all 8 intelligences, but our ‘rank’ on each varies. He gives a wordy definition of intelligence, but I’ll just summarize it for you. According to Howard smarts is basically:
Which seems like a decent definition, at first glance.
I’ll give you a quick overview of the categories, but be aware that although his ‘intelligence-types’ are popular, a lot of people disagree with Gardner’s take on intelligence.
Intelligence regarding spoken and written language. Think Shakespeare, Oprah, and Obama. Occupations: lawyers, speakers, authors, journalists, curators, etc.
The capacity to analyze logically, do math, and investigate scientifically. Develop proofs, calculate well, and solve abstract problems. Think Albert Einstein & Bill Gates. Occupations: mathematician, accountant, scientist.
Recognize & manipulate objects & space. Can process large-scale and fine-grained images. Think Frank Lloyd Wright and Amelia Earhart. Occupations: surgeons, navigators, architects, and so on.
Using one’s body to solve or create. People with this have impressive mind–body union & mastery. Think Michael Jordan and Serena Williams. Occupations: dancer, athlete, carpenter, rehab expert.
Skill in performance, composition, and appreciation of musical patterns. Able to easily manipulate musical pitch, rhythm, timbre, and tone. Think Beethoven and Ed Sheeran. Occupations: singer, composer, DJ, etc.
The ability to understand the intentions, motivations, moods, & desires of others, and leverage them for their goals. Think Mahatma Gandhi and Mother Teresa. Occupations: Teacher, sales, manager, PR.
To have deep wisdom about oneself. Using one's own desires, fears, and potential to effectively navigate life. Helps understand which life goals are important and the path to them. Think Aristotle and Maya Angelou. Occupation: therapist, psychologist, counselor, entrepreneur.
Ability to recognize the many species of flora, fauna, and the natural environment. (Plants, animals, weather and so on.) Think Charles Darwin and Jane Goodall. Occupations: botanist, biologist, meteorologist, etc.
So there you have it. Do any of the categories speak to you? Do feel ‘smart’ by fitting into one or more of them? Well, it’s good to feel positively about yourself, but it’s even better to truly know yourself. And the thing about Gardner’s intelligence-types is…
It’s basically an informed guess that happens to be appealing. It appeals to a lot of people. There could be many reasons for it’s popularity, but a major one to consider is that it’s a “feel-good” theory. It feels good to see ourselves as smart. And with Gardner’s system, we can call ourselves ‘intelligent’ as long as we fit into one of his categories.
Critics of Gardner say intelligence is just ‘one thing.’ They say ‘arbitrary categories’ have no place in it. There are people on both sides.
Each side says “Oh yeah? My theory’s stronger than yours!” over and over, while desperately seeking ‘definitive proof’ for their side.
Gardner’s backers argue intelligence categories exist. Their points are full of studies, data, and statistics. Then his critics do the same for their ‘one intelligence’ take on things.
Not much. They’re not practical, effective, or helpful for most of us. It’s pages of debate but brings little insight. Most of the ‘studies’ are so biased, that we end up having to read them all and come to our conclusions anyway.
That’s why I wrote this guide. It’s not some god-tier scientific proof for intellectuals to fight over. It’s an uncommonly insightful guide shedding light on what genius is and how you can benefit from it. I’ll cover as much as possible. And I’ll do it in the most practical, comprehensive way I can. By the end, you’ll have a better handle on what intelligence is than when you started. You’ll know more clearly what it means to you. You’ll learn how you can leverage it for your benefit, despite all the theories out there.
It’s a big claim, I know, so I’m not guaranteeing anything. But I’ve personally seen people become significantly smarter from what I teach. And I’ve written this as a path toward much higher intelligence. It’s an in-depth guide, and you won’t find better. It’s based on a simple truth: The more you understand something, the easier it is to improve at it. If we don’t understand the nuances of basketball, it’s hard to improve at it. But when we truly grasp the specifics of it, we can create an efficient path towards mastery. The same goes for intelligence.
Careers, collaborations, and opportunities often hinge on your intelligence levels. People get jobs because of how intelligent they seem. People lose jobs because of how unintelligent they are. Your reputation may be built off of how quick-witted you are in interviews. A lot of people are attracted to ‘smart’ mates with ‘good conversation.’
Now, I’m not claiming I understand intelligence better than everyone. But I do understand it better than most. And more than that, I’m a skilled teacher. And everything I’ve read on the net so far pales in comparison to what I explain below. So if you’re ready to really ‘get wise’, keep reading.
If a little cussing has “no place” in discussions of genius, this isn’t the guide for you. If you can only respect ideas when they’re ‘peer-reviewed,’ this isn’t for you. If you need 10-cent words like “pronounced socio-cultural determination”, this isn’t for you. Please take your narrow judgments and go. But on the other hand…
And that’s a good thing. The smartest people are always curious, questioning everything. They’re always seeking new ideas.
I spent my youth in accelerated classes with other ‘smart’ people. I used my smarts to become popular with all the cliques, but secretly I thought I was better than everyone. I judged pop culture. I judged the masses. I judged my friends. And because I could run ‘mental circles’ around most people, I assumed I was better than them. Getting a high-paying job straight out of high school only made my ego worse.
Without sugar-coating it, I was an asshole. Specifically a narcissistic, entitled, self-righteous mega-asshole. But no one could call me on it. If they did, I’d ‘outsmart’ them during the conversation and come off looking pretty good. Deep down they’d feel that I was behaving poorly, but they could never articulate it or pin down exactly how.
And I didn’t even realize I was doing it, because I was blind to most of the consequences.
Until life humbled me, hard.
I went from acing gifted classes to being a homeless, depressed, suicidal failure. I lost my girlfriend, best friend, & family. And although I kept up my entitled ways for a while, raging against the unfairness of life… the truth is I deserved my dark years on the streets.
Now I’m thankful for them. They sanded off a lot of the edges of my personality. They made me hyper-sensitive to ever having such an arrogant approach to life again. My failures humbled me into using my intelligence in more loving, productive, helpful ways. They woke me up to ‘karma’, and helped me care more about having integrity than impressing society.
I folded my failing businesses and began giving wisdom and insights away freely. And that simple act started a chain-reaction that got me back on my feet. I ended up as a right-hand advisor to (celebrity entrepreneur) Evan Carmichael for about a decade. He valued my input deeply, and we basically built a mini-empire together.
I answered a lot of questions for a lot of people.
The asker had to be cooperative, sincere, and receptive to the answers, but as long as those bases were covered… I delivered insightful answers to all kinds of questions. But don’t take my word for it, check out the testimonials below.
So you’ll know where I’m coming from. So you’ll understand why I’m such a passionate teacher. So you’ll get why I care about intelligence so much, and why I have a lot to offer here. Much of what has been written on genius is boring. And it rarely persuades anyone to a helpful perspective.
I’m not sure what Donald Trump’s level of intelligence is, but I’m fairly sure he’s above-average at persuading the masses. Muhammad Ali wasn’t exactly mensa-level, but boy could he charm interviewers and fans. Beyonce’s reasonably intelligent I’m sure, but I’d bet a sway of the hips and her million-watt smile gets more people supporting her causes compared to her dropping some well-reasoned logic.
And that’s ok. I get it. Agreeing with charmers feels good. Believing in things we want to believe is easy.
And by and large, our society has raised most of us to avoid effort. This creates an interesting situation where the loudest and brightest in our society are the people who charm us into agreeing. They shut off our analytical minds. This leaves us with a noisy, flashy, dumbed-down idiocracy, where the smart people are all but invisible.
So I’m psyched to share all the interesting ideas I have about society’s wisest, but most people would rather just be persuaded to join a cause or something. What are the chances a mega-guide like this gets the attention of the ‘mainstream?’ The masses aren’t intellectually curious, good at pattern recognition, or perceptive. Which means…
This is because it takes smarts to properly assess another person’s intelligence. So if someone ‘thinks like us but a bit better,’ society labels them smart.
But the truly smart think almost nothing ‘like us’. They talk differently too. It’s been coined ‘communication range’.
Communication range was originally suggested by researcher Leta Hollingworth, then popularized by Grady M. Towers. It means that people with a high IQ think so differently than others, that “meaningful communication” isn’t really a thing. It’s like a man talking to an ant. Things like small talk & customer service are doable, but truly meaningful communication isn’t possible. This is why marriages are happiest when the IQ of the spouses is close.
So although we’re all speaking ‘English, for example, smart people just seem like snobby nerds, and lesser-thinkers just seem dumb in return. And instead of seeming smart, the intelligent are often labeled weird, odd, eccentric, sharp, or overly serious instead.
Average-minded people just don’t (yet) have the ability, to recognize a smart person, even when next to them. It’s easy to ‘detect down for intelligence, but not to ‘detect up’. And there’s something that makes it all even trickier.
And why wouldn’t they?
Gandhi. Martin Luther King. John Lennon. Tupac & Biggie. The list goes on. Were these people incredibly smart? Depends on your definition. Whatever the case, they spoke uncomfortable truths. They offered wisdom that ran counter to the prevailing culture of their time.
They were shining lights, clearly elevating society with their contributions. They “shouldn’t” have been killed. But they stood firmly for what they believed in. They drew the ire of certain groups and individuals and got taken out.
Because smart people often understand truths about life the average person doesn’t. They often want to contribute their ‘secret knowledge’ to society. But it’s a tough choice. They could share ‘controversial’ truths and become targets. Or they can keep to themselves, sit on their wisdom, and attempt to sneak through life unnoticed. Smart people learn from society’s clear past.
Anyway, we’ll revisit how to spot smart people (if it’s even possible), and how to bring them out of hiding later. For now, I’ll tell you about a little ‘game’.
OK, they don’t play this, exactly. But they do realize that defending wrong views helps no one. They get that changing their mind when new data arrives, is victory. They know it’s not a good look to be doggedly hanging on to a weak view. So, they’re quick to admit when they’re wrong. Admitting we’re wrong is a key step in discovering the truth.
Defending our wrong-headed opinions is the number one block to discovering truth.
To be smart, we must be open-minded, eager for truth even if it hurts, and quick to admit the second we realize we’re wrong. About anything.
Geniuses are good at changing their minds when they learn something new.
For example, here’s a view many people hold. “Celebrities are smart.” Believing this, they take every word their favorite celebrity says as gospel. They ‘buy-in’ to every idea their idols are selling. Is this really a behavior worth holding on to?
You’ll see it’s better, but people would still rather hear from their heroes instead. Even though the gurus, experts, and influencers they look up to don’t have much to offer on the topic of intelligence. They’re just good at their craft. They’re good at charming people. They’re good at catchy soundbites. And though those things require intelligence, they don’t make our idols truly wise.
Most don’t teach intelligence insightfully. So if we’re looking for a deeper understanding of ‘smart’, we’d best be careful listening to most celebs. I’m not saying that no famous person has anything of value to say — of course they do. Plenty. I’m just saying do your research by going beyond what you hear in popular media.
Ever notice that we often assume since a person is rich, they acquired that wealth because they’re smart? There’s little evidence for that. Some people get rich from luck. Others through hard work. Others through ‘law of attraction.’ Others because they happen to be excellent salesmen. Others inherited wealth. At the same time, some of the smartest people struggle to sell their genius ideas, and can’t make money from them. (Study Nikola Tesla for more on this.)
Similarly, we assume that if somebody is famous, they’ve gotta be smart, right? Nope. They could be charming or persuasive only. They could have a team of smart people behind them. They could’ve just been at the right place, at the right time, in front of the right journalist. Fame comes in many shapes and sizes, and I’m not sure any of them are related to intelligence.
And beautiful people are often given special treatment. I’ve seen plenty of guys blindly agree with things a beautiful woman says. I’ve even seen them defend a model’s factually incorrect views, simply because they’re enchanted by her beauty. Being beautiful can come from genetics, focused nutrition and exercise, fashion, make-up, and more… but it certainly doesn’t mean someone is automatically smart. It doesn’t even make it significantly more likely.
Things like riches, fame, and beauty might be indicators of intelligence. But they’d be weak at best, and usually steer people wrong if anything.
Say you meet a smart person. Their intelligence is no guarantee they’ll end up rich, famous, or beautiful. But it does enable them to learn to be those things, should they put their mind to it.
For example:
Have you ever met someone who seems smart, but makes foolish decisions? This can happen for many reasons. It may be immaturity. It may be part of someone’s “life path”. It may be a ‘condition’ of some kind, or emotionality clouding things, etc. The point is, be careful writing off a ‘bad choice’ here or there as a sign of stupidity.
Observe as long as you can manage, before declaring a person ‘smart’ or not.
Precocious youth director David Lubinksi says even that may be unreliable. He says if someone is smart, that’s just like owning a car with a powerful engine. He says “If there’s no gas in your car you’re not going to go anywhere. If road conditions are bad, you’re not going to go anywhere”. His point is clear:
This is why we need thinkers, do-ers, and most importantly, hybrids who do both. We need people who think clearly and execute well.
Action without forethought tends to go poorly. It has its place, sure, but usually ends up in less-than-pleasant results. It leads to mistakes, mishaps, and chaos. But learning by blind trial-and-error is sometimes effective. Action and doing are often very valuable.
Being entirely a ‘thinker’ isn’t that smart at all. That said, the world has more than enough “do-ers” who plunge ahead thoughtlessly. It has plenty who put their emotions ahead of truth or what’s best for humanity. It’s why so many of the world’s biggest problems still exist. It’s why very little headway is made, generation after generation. Zero long-term thinking. Minimal smarts. The world could use more good-hearted, critical thinkers. And I don’t just mean self-proclaimed ones. I’m talking about actually wise people So I keep feeding my mind well and teaching what I’ve learned.
I aim for a healthy mind, and I hope you do too.
It’s an offensive question, I know. But I’m asking it for a reason. There are similarities between intelligence and nutrition. Both are essential for personal health and longevity. Both are instrumental in advancing humanity. Both are heavily judged by others. You can feed your body with non-ideal nutrition, and you can feed your mind with non-ideal info.
Let’s say we have two people, Joe, and Jane. Does it matter if Joe binges ‘fluff’ all day long? Does it matter if he has zero intention of self-improvement? And learns next to nothing from his journey in life? Does this make Joe ‘worse’ than Jane, who feeds her mind with the highest quality wisdom she can find?
Does it matter in nutrition? Because surely, the world makes room for all body types & eating-plans. So, surely it makes room for all intellect-types and education plans too, right? It’s not so much that one type of lifestyle is worse than the other.
It’s more that problems arise from denial.
If I’m overweight, obese, or unhealthy… I need to admit it, rather than paint a happy face on it and claim I’m slender and fit.
The same goes for intelligence. To have a higher quality of life, it’s key that we admit where we are. There’s no shame in it. Un-smart people aren’t worse than smart ones, the same way fat people aren’t worse than thin ones. All that matters is we embrace where we’re at in life. Then, either accept it, or change it.
Mountains of research is done on what ‘smart’ is and how to measure it. And all that research is inconclusive. You could study it for your lifetime and still not fully comprehend it. Humanity’s best and brightest are still only guessing, but it’s ok. Because like electricity, not fully understanding intelligence can’t keep us from its benefits. At least enough to make our lives better. Hollywood movies convince us intelligence is one thing. Grades teach us it’s another. But don’t buy into the stereotypes.
Most definitions say intelligence is something like:
IQ is the most common measure of intelligence, and many psychologists are passionate about it. They relate IQ to brain volume, neural speed, and memory capacity.
Personally, I wouldn’t trust an IQ test (despite scoring highly on them). There are huge variations in the test results because of culture, genetics, testing practices, and more.
Two supposedly fair intelligence tests are Cattell’s and Raven’s. These tests focus on measuring “g”, or general intelligence, rather than specific skill sets. But even these aren’t that appealing.
For example, researchers have noticed lower IQs appear to be linked to felons and higher IQs seem linked to wealth. But it’s just something that seems to be linked. It’s not ‘hard science’ or anything. ‘Links’ can come from anything, environment, culture, upbringing, genetics, who knows.
Science runs study after study, but they almost all use the word ‘correlational’. Correlation can be a very helpful thing, but usually just means “X seems related to Y, but we’re not really sure. Plus, even if we are sure they’re linked, we have no idea exactly how or why.”
In fact, science is so obsessed with ‘measurements’ that they often miss the forest for the trees.
A scale reliably measures weight. A watch reliably measures time. But not even our best IQ tests measure intelligence in a useful way at all. And it’s been like that for ages.
And even if we could measure intelligence, is there a difference between it and wisdom? Or intelligence and creativity? Are they linked? Are they created by nature? Nurture? Both? Are intelligence tests biased by years of racism, classism, sexism all tied to chats about “who is smarter than whom”?
The questions spiral on.
Although intelligence, creativity, and wisdom may appear to be similar, there are differences. What makes it tricky to talk about, are many definitions of each term differ. So here’s my best explanation of the three.
Intelligence is hyper-rational, data-based, and focused mostly on our immediate environment. It’s IQ, logic, and related analytical skills. Convergent, it narrowly focuses on ‘right’ answers and scores highly on tests. Does best with well-structured problems to solve. Responsible for scoring highly on ‘tests’ given by others. Generally unoriginal.
Creativity gives a novel, surprising, and useful idea. Divergent, it often connects distant concepts and embraces multiple ‘right’ answers. Does best when problems are ill-structured. There are as many ways to write a novel as there are novelists. The same goes for painting and artists. Inventions and scientists. And there certainly are no clear paths to it. Unfortunately, few people find any path at all. Often original.
Wisdom seeks the common good. It does this by balancing our interests with society’s and the globe’s, both long- and short-term. It’s dialectical (ie: ‘merges opposites’). It’s positive, contextual, and all-encompassing. Wisdom does best with moral quandaries, higher-order thought, and resonant truths. It’s self-aware and ethically aware. Original & elusive.
So, being an intelligent person doesn’t guarantee you’re a wise person. And being wise doesn’t always guarantee intelligence. And neither guarantee creativity. But they’re frequently found together.
Because what we measure as intelligence isn’t enough. IQ isn’t enough. “Having a great intellect is truly smart”, you say? Not even close. Because we’d still be Neanderthals were it not for human creativity. And we’d have more World Wars without wisdom.
All three of these thinking approaches are necessary to make up a truly great mind. So what are the chances someone scores highly in all three areas? Not great, it seems. That’s partly why it’s hard to spot true geniuses.
You see it all the time. People labeling ‘smart’ or ‘average’ or ‘stupid’ in a heartbeat. As if they’ve been studying intelligence for years, and they know exactly which is which. They often base these on signs such as:
Wrong. Truly smart people realize that communication is important. They realize that clarity is vital. They realize that showing off with ten-cent words and spewing jargon is bad. They get that it hinders communication, not helps it. Smart people simplify things for others, not complicate them. If someone relies on big words or complex concepts, they’re not nearly as smart as they think. But they’re probably desperate to seem so.
Wrong. Most smart people manage to develop a ‘secondary persona’. One that helps them to ‘get by’ and interact with others. They’ll often appear to be as ‘normal’ as others because they’ve used their intelligence to blend in. But it’s uncomfortable to ‘dumb down’ their thinking for too long. So they may retreat from society to recharge. They may hang around a very select circle of friends who let them be themselves. This brings us to the next thing people think is an indication of wisdom.
Kind of. It’s fairly common in smart people. Conversation is valuable. Words are valuable. Air-time is valuable. Smart people understand this and make sure not to waste bandwidth on fluff that accomplishes nothing for themselves or humanity. This doesn’t mean they don’t have fun, or make jokes, it just means they avoid meaningless gossip, drama, and hyper-obvious statements.
Not exactly. Many smart people do report being bullied. This is because when a dumb person meets a smart one, they only have two choices. A. Humbly learn from them and try harder or B. Belittle, dismiss, and laugh at them. And since most people would rather die than admit someone else is smarter than them, they often choose B. But this still isn’t a good indicator of intelligence, because all kinds of people get bullied for all kinds of reasons.
Wrong. Oftentimes people are deemed smart because they accomplish tasks for others. They’re the “go-to” person. But just because someone is competent at something or even many things, doesn’t mean they’re intelligent. Perhaps they’re just a people-pleaser. Perhaps the tasks are hard for them, but they do them through force of will. Perhaps they have a knack for it. While smart people are often good across multiple fields, this still isn’t a good indicator of intelligence.
Wrong. Many consider calm, polite people who don’t ruffle feathers… “smart”. And while it’s true that intelligent people lean towards civility and emotional control, there’s plenty of polite, kind people who would be tough to call smart. And some pretty mean people could be called ‘dumb’. I haven’t explored why polite people are sometimes labeled as smart, but let’s just say this isn’t a reliable sign of genius.
The point is, a lot of people think they can spot genius, but they can’t.
Which is probably why scientists keep trying to come up with ‘tests’ for it.
Intelligence, wisdom, and creativity are so vast, that testing for them seems silly. It’s like making a person do exercises to figure out if they’re going to “go Columbine” on society. We simply don’t have tests that can determine this.
As long as you take it for what it is. The problem comes when we hyper-focus on it. That’s when people quickly divide into extreme sides.
One side claims IQ is meaningless. They believe smarts relate to career, academic, or life success. (e.g., Howard Gardner, Robert Sternberg). The other side claims IQ is absolute. They believe intelligence is one over-arching factor that can be measured. (e.g., Charles Murray, Jordan Peterson). The truth is probably both. IQ is more like a measurement of a car’s horsepower. While horsepower is a helpful number, it’s bad for predicting race-winners. Experienced drivers know racing relies on torque, handling, and tire friction. They know it takes technique, track-familiarity, and more. A huge-horsepower dragster is impressive, sure. But it’s useless, even harmful, outside of a drag-strip.
“He stressed…the remarkable diversity of intelligence and the… need to study it using qualitative… not quantitative, measures.” – Alfred Binet, inventor of IQ.
Besides, IQ is measured against a population. It can’t be measured by arbitrary tests created by one culture. It’s unreliable as soon as it’s applied to members of another culture.
The point is people who think IQ measures intelligence are wrong. It doesn’t. And it’s futile to track the many traits of intelligence into a manageable score. It’s like trying to score a person’s “level of faith” or their “feelings about life”. To argue that all smartness that matters is measured by IQ tests is silly. Society has been sold this myth ever since the first IQ test.
The g factor is what modern science sees as ‘intelligence’. It’s the main thing modern IQ tests are ‘measuring’. The existence of g is based on a bunch of fancy math words like ‘variance’, ‘correlation’, ‘unitary’, and so on.
They’re not rules. they’re probabilities. IQ tests measure three things. Mainly g, some non-g intelligence traits, and ‘uniqueness’. Are these tests truly measuring some unseen, untouched ‘intelligence’? Many scientists say yes. They believe g is measurable. They’ll tell you there’s “substantial evidence” g exists. But it’s kind of like arguing over the existence of God, or ghosts, or meaning in life.
Does anyone have conclusive proof? Does any of it really matter in your day-to-day life? No. What matters is that you have enough understanding of smartness to benefit from it.
Can g predict whether someone is smart? Can it tell who will become smart? Can it tell who’ll apply their smarts? If it could, money would be flowing. Corporations would pay millions, leveraging g to get bright minds on their payroll. Many of the world’s best minds haven’t even been tested, and may never be. Einstein’s IQ was never tested. But the dude was clearly brilliant. And if you couldn’t tell that by talking to him, it can be seen by his results. You don’t need a weigh-scale to tell if a woman is beautiful, and you don’t need to g-test to know if someone has a beautiful mind.
“Not everything that can be counted counts and not everything that counts can be counted.” – William Bruce Cameron
So, should we talk about g instead of IQ? I don’t recommend discussing either. They’re both for average minds in the science & math community.
As it stands, g is just the best representation of intelligence science has come up with. But I’ma be honest with you… most scientists have never struck me as very smart. They’re methodical, sure. And they’ve given us great things like the lightbulb, microwaves, and smartphones. But when it gets down to the biggest questions of life, they constantly stumble. They spend ages proving stuff that artists, poets, and wise men have known since the beginning.
As in most professions, the bulk of people in science aren’t very impressive. Mostly they’re just people who get off on big words, ‘studies’, and proof. And there’s nothing wrong with that.
Most definitions of these categories are confusing and wordy AF. Like g, I’m not even sure these two ‘types’ of intelligence exist, but people do talk about them. So I’ll explain ’em briefly.
Crystallized intelligence is applying knowledge to solve problems. Imagine learning a piano-piece by practicing it daily, until you’re masterful at it.
Crystalized Intelligence = Using knowledge to solve the familiar.
Fluid intelligence is using logic to solve new problems in new situations. Imagine sitting down at a piano with a totally new score, and playing it fairly well by sight.
Fluid Intelligence = Ability to improvise in the unfamiliar. (This is more what g supposedly refers to.)
We each have different degrees of both. And they change at different rates as we grow. To me, a ‘smart’ person is one with good amounts of skill in both areas. Similar to how a good car has speed & responsiveness.
Whew! I hope this is all making sense.
The funny thing is, it almost feels like a waste of time to explain. Why? Because none of this stuff applies to my explanation of intelligence. My explanation is quite different.
I’m just pointing out something worth acknowledging.
Genius comes from the same place beauty comes from. The same place evolution comes from. The same place inspiration comes from. The great unknown. Nature. God. Source. The universe.
Genius is an awesome blend of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. It synthesizes the unexpected from the mundane. It absorbs vast data from wide-ranging sources. It combines them in brilliant ways.
As babies, we were all fast learners. We were ‘geniuses’. There are some genetic differences and some start smarter than others, sure. But overall, we intelligently navigated our world, taking in data, and growing from it quickly. We learned jaw-droppingly fast. Not because we ‘tried hard’. Not because parents made us. Not because our brains were ‘different’ then. We learned fast because we were tapped into the thing that provides genius. We tapped into a natural, evolutionary intelligence. It gave us inspiration, intuitive leaps, and epic solutions to our problems. Eventually, society trains us away from most of our intelligence. But it’s still available, waiting to be tapped into.
True genius is something you can intentionally tap into and benefit from. It comes from a combination of 3 factors.
If a person focuses obsessively enough on something, backed by supportive beliefs and an uplifted mood regarding it… they become smart in this area.
Certain people ‘on the spectrum’ are good examples of this. Or a child who’s slow to develop, but suddenly finds their ‘calling’ and becomes masterful at it.
If you took a person and helped them focus obsessively on ‘being smart’. Something amazing would happen. They’d start becoming smart. If you helped them embody solid beliefs, and an uplifted mood about their smarts for long enough, they’d blossom.
In fact, this is what my parents did for me while raising me. They continually helped me focus on being smart. They continually guided my beliefs in my own intelligence. They made sure I never beat myself up, and that I always maintained a positive mood around my intellect. My parents did similar for my siblings, who are also rather smart. This is similar to the mysterious-but-powerfully-effective… placebo-effect.
The placebo effect is a thing. It often works. It’s often effective. And the times it doesn’t work, I suggest is only because people don’t properly understand it. It’s related to quantum physics and the law of attraction. It results in ‘miracles’ and has transformed physiology. And it plays a huge role in actually becoming smart. And it has three foundations I’ll explain shortly. Those 3 things connect you to true genius.
True genius isn’t just having a photographic memory or answering a scientist’s questions to their satisfaction. It’s a blend of intellect, creativity, and wisdom. It embodies many traits no one has even tried to measure, let alone ones that are factored into current tests.
They love all ideas. They don't judge them. They're happy ideas exist. Even bad ones. Because those 'bad' ideas may connect or lead them to truly brilliant ones. They respond well to unconventional ideas. They assess ideas on their merit, without snapping or recoiling. Unlike close-minded people who hear what they don't like and get triggered. Then lose all access to logic, reason, and intelligence.
They have a massive focus on what's possible. They believe a path to a solution exists, and like a dog with a bone, they refuse to let go until it's theirs. Unlike less tenacious thinkers, who rub up against a problem and think "oh well, not solvable." They're constantly imagining solutions, improvements, and a better world.
They're able to see multiple angles to a problem. They can forecast how the problem or solution will affect other areas of life. They can often see if it will raise future problems down the road. Unlike those with myopic vision. Those only focused on one step ahead of them, blind to the majority of repercussions.
They simplify often. They're constantly looking to get back to solid mental foundations. They get to fundamental truths and build their knowledge upward. Unlike those who reason by analogy and what the majority approves of. People who avoid first principles entirely.
Smart people value accuracy & precision. Especially in their area of expertise. They choose ideas carefully. Words as well. Because they know that communicating ideas is part of what intelligence is all about. Unlike sloppy thinkers & speakers, conveying inaccurate, imprecise things and creating confusion in others.
They question a lot. They question themselves, their conclusions, their beliefs. They question if anything has changed since the last time they relied on a fact. They question whether their data is reliable. They question whether others' data is reliable. They question their logic, their mindset, their emotions. They ask very good questions, with a very good purpose. This directly contrasts with most of society, who question nearly nothing.
Failure is data. Failure is eliminating a way that didn't work. Making a mistake is valuable. Being proven wrong is a thrill, because it means they learned something new, and have a solid new piece of data to rely on for next time. Contrast this with the majority of people who will perform epic mental gymnastics just to avoid admitting they're wrong.
The reason they're so good at embracing failure, is because only the truth matters. They don't care about looking bad, they care about finding the truth. They don't care about ruffling feathers, they care about finding the truth. They don't care about a bit of extra mental effort, they care about finding the truth. This is how most toddlers start out. They ask why, uncaring of failure, only seeking useful wisdom. Unfortunately, most people abandon truth-seeking in favor of comfortable, unchallenging thinking.
This is a bit like open-mindedness, because it comes from a love of ideas. A love of data. Smart people are 'greedy' for data. Why decide what road to take, when you can GPS from your couch? Discover road conditions, detours, and destinations? Why dismiss someone, when you can observe them closely and discover their value? Smart people gather as much data as they can, before coming to conclusions. Unlike most people who make snap-judgments, ignoring all the data life is serving up.
This doesn't mean they're cruel, it just means they see beyond 'good' and 'evil'. They realize that the correct, helpful, or beneficial course of action changes. What was helpful at one time or culture, may not help here, now. The 'good' choices that worked previously may be 'bad' in a new situation. They won't get sucked into talk of good and evil. Instead, smart people focus on producing the most desirable outcome for all. Unlike average-thinkers who bicker about the good & evil of politics. They fight over the right & wrong of celebrity behavior. They argue on the 'light' or 'dark' side of current trends.
They experiment. Especially if minimal data is present, or something is unknown, they'll experiment. They experiment often. Always seeing if they can find a better, smarter, more efficient way to results. By doing this they quickly surpass more timid learners. And if they have a teacher, or observe the experiments of others, they'll soak up that valuable data as well. But whatever data they get, they challenge. They put it to the test. All results are questioned until they're sure their conclusions are secure.
And these experiments are all very methodical. Wise people know that changing many variables at once is foolish. They know it teaches very little. If they're adjusting a recipe, they change ONE spice and taste-test, to see what impact that one spice had. If it made the recipe better, they add it to their permanent recipe, and proceed to test ONE MORE spice. Step by step. Methodical experiments. If they're trying to persuade someone to listen, and it fails, they discard that approach. Then they methodically move on to another. Everything is very intentional. They indulge zero panic, anxiety, or jumping around. They methodically see things to a result. They know a solution's out there, and patiently test paths to it, efficiently. When's the last time you saw an average person do this?
They practice focusing all their senses on a goal. Especially when that goal is learning. If they're absorbing a lesson, smart people are listening intently. They listen not just to the teacher's words, but to their tone, inflection, body language and more. If they're taking notes and the lighting's too low, they quickly add illumination. If it's at all possible to get a physical or practical example of what's being taught, they'll seek it out to touch. They practice focus like this for as long as possible, because a wandering mind misses vital data. Unlike most people's distraction, and their failure to retain most of what's in front of them.
Smart people practice their recall skills. They value memory. They know that memory is the foundation of knowledge. They know that by remembering ideas & solutions, they can use those pieces as 'idea-legos'. They're building-blocks for creating more beneficial ideas and deeper understandings. So they're constantly challenging their own recall and understandings, to ensure they're solid.
Despite smart people's logical approach, they never discount their intuition. Einstein knew knowledge, facts, and logic only get you so far. Tesla knew he was connected to a deeper, wider, higher power. Goethe knew you could believe yourself into genius. And that was actually how the universe works. Smart people know they have a connection to something greater. That their intuition is insanely valuable. They act accordingly. Unlike people who immediately talk themselves out of their intuition with mental rhetoric.
“Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution.”
“Magic is believing in yourself, if you can do that, you can make anything happen.”
“My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration.”
Think about your focus.
You can focus on being more open-minded, questioning, truth-seeking, and so on. Or you can choose to focus on Netflix, election-drama, & covid-narratives. What you choose to focus on determines what qualities you develop. Focus decides whether you’re smart, or just an average-thinker pretending to be smart.
Plus, you can choose to hyper-focus on details, or you can choose a holistic overview. You can focus on numbers, fact, and intellect. You can focus on deep wisdom. You can focus on neither, or both.
Sloppy thinkers practice focusing their attention hardly at all. And it shows. They miss the point often, because their attention is on irrelevant things. They’re distracted easily. The narrow beam of their attention easily loses focus from the topic at hand. Life tries teaching them, but their focus-beam is so weak, they absorb none of the lesson.
Truly great minds practice masterful control over their focus. They control whether it’s specific or general, and when.
This is why so many geniuses are described as ‘obsessed’. Personally, I’d replace IQ tests with focus-tests. ‘Beam-control’ tests. Attention-tests. Something that tests a person’s mastery over their own focus and attention. It’d be a huge wake-up call to everyone who thinks they’re smart. Because big words & rote facts are nothing compared to one who uses their focus to raise their smarts.
And then the question would become…
True geniuses are those who focus quickly & easily on increasing wisdom, creativity, and knowledge. I’m not sure this is something we can ‘see’, but people are always trying to do it.
But none of them talk about focus. Some of the signs I’ve heard are listed below. They may be helpful to you, but the truest signs of genius are beliefs, mood, and focus regarding any given problem.
Since great minds value their focus, they avoid wasting it on 'busywork'. They know they could be doing something 'better'.
They're practical. Related to the previous point, great minds want results. They want a valuable benefit to come from their valuable focus. Even if they're 'failing', it's focused on eliminating things that don't work. All so they can zero in on an effective approach.
The quiet wallflower that everyone ignores, may be the smartest one at the party. The homeless guy who refuses to do what society deems proper, may be the smartest one on the street. The advisor behind your favorite politician, may be the smartest person at the debate. Sometimes smart people refuse to be 'normal', so it may be worth a look.
If you're looking anywhere there is lies, drama, or chaos, you probably won't find a great mind. They've already wisely stepped away from that situation.
Smart people can be found anywhere, even in groups. But be careful. Because whoever the group is focused on or paying most attention to will tend to skew things. It's easy to get caught up in thinking celebrity X or radio-host Y is smart, simply because 'the group' believes it.
Because they have such great focus, geniuses can learn something quickly, and move on to other topics. They can easily enjoy the wide buffet of ideas life has to offer, and so they do. They're often polymaths. They see the value in outside fields. They realize everything's connected. So even if they're learning something 'outside' their field... they know they can apply it back to their core discipline.
They tend to disagree with many conventional ideas. This is because many conventional ideas are obsolete. Yet they're still believed by average-thinkers. Or conventional ideas are poorly founded. Yet they remain popularized by average-thinkers. Or better ideas exist. Yet they've not been considered by average-thinkers. There's loads of reasons for truly great minds to disagree with commonly held beliefs.
This goes along with the previous point. Depending on their maturity-level, smart people will often snap at dumb people. Even the most zen of men have the chance of snapping. They'll be pouring effort to help out an average-thinker. Meanwhile that person simply refuses to open their mind. Their frustration builds up during the conversation. But the 'slower' person rarely notices it. Then "all-of-a-sudden" the smart person "blows up" in anger. Traumatized, smart minds may paint all 'normies' with the same brush.
Smart people can usually see the big picture. They think things through. They understand that acting based on fleeting emotions rarely gets results. So smart people often demonstrate discipline. They often 'play the long game' to get what they want. Whether that's in an experiment, a job or project, a conversation or politics, etc.
A 'locus of control' is what we believe about results. If we believe results rely on our personal choices, we have an internal locus. If we believe our results come from events outside of us, they have an external one. Smart people have so many traits that lead to an internal locus of control. It's strange to find a smart person who can't solve problems. Or overcome obstacles. They're used to getting results using their own choices and abilities. So this is a good thing to look for.
Just because I wrote them in a large font doesn’t mean they’re rock-solid, or guaranteed ways to spot smart souls. They’re just things I’ve heard suggested. One of them doesn’t automatically mean “Aha! Genius”! But if you notice a blend of these things in someone, plus some of the underrated traits I listed earlier, then there’s a high chance you’ve found a truly great mind. Of course, a truly smart person would observe their target over time, gathering data, to determine if they are indeed… truly smart.
The group, tribe, or collective is always exerting pressure and influence on outliers. If you uproot an American and put them into a European country, what happens? Despite them being a die-hard hand-shaker, they begin greeting friends with a kiss on the cheek. Or they at least begin using slang they’d never dreamed of before, like ‘wanker’. Or drop them into the middle east, and even if they’re lefty, they’ll quickly learn to use their right hand for eating. All because culture exerts vast influence on the people in it.
They may not even realize it. And even if they’re smart, they may end up embracing culture just to avoid confrontation or discord. A ‘culture’ is an environment. And the one we’re in exerts pressure on anyone ‘going against it’.
It means an environment of ‘dumb masses’ pressure the ‘smart few’, hard. They do this just by existing, the same way a Middle-Eastern culture would pressure a visiting westerner. Being smart can feel difficult. Unpleasant.
Truly great minds usually won’t give into the cultural pressure…
But the pressure is always there. Smart people are drowning in it. It’s like a sea of stupidity, and it takes a lot of mental effort and strength to maintain ones integrity and wisdom in it.
Smart minds are often treading water in a sea of average beliefs, average approaches, and average-thinkers. Now imagine they get tired of dealing with it. Imagine they don’t have the mental strength necessary to buck the influence of an idiocracy? What happens?
They cave to the influence and become just like everyone around them. They let go of their mental discipline and get sucked under, into a culture of closed-minds.
All a smart person wants, is to be themselves, contribute what their mind has to offer, and be loved and rewarded for their contribution. Same as any human. Instead no one gets them. Their value is ignored or reviled. Their culture holds them underwater, and they retreat to anywhere they can find a breath of fresh air.
It’s a solution to being immersed in stupidity all-day, every day.
Smart people are often bullied, marginalized, and cast-out. Society is designed for the middle of the curve. It’s designed to help the average majority be comfortable. It’s not designed to challenge them. It’s not designed for the differently abled. It’s not designed to embrace genius.
Because of this, many smart souls view society with suspicion or hostility. Western hierarchy is harsh. Society loves someone slightly different, but hates those who are extremely different. Since during childhood peers, teachers, and parents all appeared to be enemies, many geniuses believe that’s all the world is. Being hated by enemies. They offer their insight. They aim to correct and help others. But no good deed ever goes unpunished.
Once a genius has become bitter towards society, they tend to become more and more isolated. They embrace their role as an outsider, and never re-connect to the society that seemed to have no place for them.
This loneliness and isolation is so common, it has become a trope. “Intelligence Equals Isolation”.
Real geniuses can experience existential crises, social anxiety, depression, autism, nihilism, and more. Often their whole lives. Imagine not being able to enjoy day-to-day life like everyone else. Why? Because you’re a different, gifted, outcast. Imagine people disliking you just because you know things they don’t, and having to hide it just to fit in. They have a different ‘communication range’ than average people, which makes meaningful interaction quite difficult, like a person talking to an ant. True geniuses often struggle with identity and sink bit by bit into the stormy seas of meaninglessness.
Since admitting others may be smarter than us ‘feels bad’, most of society just chooses to hate wisdom. And the funniest part is, the wisdom-haters are the ones who appear most intelligent.
They’ve spent so much time and energy trying to look smart because they’re so ashamed of admitting they might know less than others. They’ll use flowery, intellectual words. They’ll cite stats and studies. They’ll run circles around you with rhetoric. They’ll dress stylishly and charm you. They’ll hold ‘respected jobs’ that make them look smart. They’ll do everything they can to get people thinking they’re smart.
But the truly wise avoid most of this song and dance. They’re not out there trying to look smarter than others. They’re simply offering their wisdom, creativity, and intelligence to the few people who are receptive to it. They’re rarely correcting ‘the masses’ or calling out the wannabes because all it does is make the wisdom-haters dig in their heels more, and turn a smart person into a target.
You don’t have to be smart to get money, fame, power, beauty, or anything else you want.
And the truly wise are those who consciously and intentionally wield their beliefs, mood, and focus to problem-solve. Sometimes this means developing smarter traits, sometimes it means collaborating with people who have them, sometimes it means ‘creating your own luck’.
Whatever the case, the unwise neglect these 3 key ingredients and languish in mediocrity, realizing very few of their dreams. Smart people make wise choices about these 3 things. They value their focus, they’re careful with their beliefs, they elevate their mood. They do this because they understand this is the path towards solutions, achievement, and dream realization.
Each passing day you could practice the most important life skills.
You deserve to unlock the path to everything you want, and it’s easy. The only thing is you’re either a person who’s wasting the opportunity for improvement or a person who’s stepping up and using it.
That’s because I’m trying to use examples that resonate and speak to the majority of people who read this. Names like Einstein and Tesla and Musk ‘click’ with people quite well.
This article is 15,000 words long. Hopefully, dear reader, you can understand that it’s not meant to be a giant crusade against society’s biases towards male geniuses.
For example, I’d love to explain that female geniuses are everywhere. They use the tools of genius just as well as men. They use their beliefs, moods, and most importantly, focus. It’s just that they use them to become genius at less intellectual things. They use them to become geniuses at performance and expression. They use their focus to become genius at fashion and body language. They use their focus to become genius at care-giving. Many women are more brilliant at these subjects than Einstein or Tesla could ever dream of being. Why? Because those are the areas many women have decided to become genius at.
I’d love to dig deeper into this, but it’s not the point of the article. I hope that makes sense and you can see the truth:
That’s correct, I made no attempt to account for genetics.
Genetics evolve. Some people evolved their stomachs to digest metal. There are ‘genetically normal people’ who’ve transformed their cells. They’ve become immune to cold and illness under the instruction of Wim Hof.
Yes, people can start with genetic advantages and disadvantages, but intense focus, positive beliefs, and elevated mood can transform a human being. It’s the process of evolution and mutation and it can happen faster than most people imagine.
The point is, I’m not here to tackle nature vs. nurture, or whether genetics or environment, or upbringing are more important for creating genius. I’m here to give insight.
I got a jump-start on being smart. I was extra creative, wise, and intelligent since I was little. But being something doesn’t mean we understand something. I was intelligent but didn’t understand intelligence. And I suffered for it. I ended up homeless for years, betrayed, abandoned, jailed, failed 15+ businesses, and attempted suicide. Because having smarts, but misunderstanding how the world treats smart people is torture. It’s a recipe for pain. And it’s easily solvable. So I spent some crazy amount of time and energy making this page, hopefully, to help smart people understand their own life’s journey, and to help society understand more about intelligence. I dream of people getting a leg up on this topic.
Fast learners are what humanity needs. We crawl at a snail’s pace on society’s biggest issues, because people don’t learn very fast. But they could.
I’ve got to convince people to invest effort in their thinking. I’ve got to wake them up from auto-pilot thought-processes and spoon-fed media. I’ve got to persuade them that being wrong is a blessing, and they should actively seek it out. I’ve got to convince people to practice smartness. So I’m studying persuasion. I’m building my influence. I’m attracting the money, power, popularity, and respect that will be necessary. Will I accomplish it in my lifetime? Who knows. But I’ll have fun trying.
You didn’t come to earth to reach a certain ceiling of intelligence, and that’s it. You came to earth to grow. Grow your intelligence. Grow your success. Grow your mind and body. Deep down in your DNA, you know this. But society has trained us away from the main tools of our growth. It’s trained us away from our focus. It’s trained us away from controlling our beliefs. It’s trained us away from elevating our moods. Society’s obsession with instant-gratification and misunderstandings of life has trained us away from critical thinking skills and expending mental effort. I’d love to help you let go of all the unhelpful trainings. I’d love to help you move beyond what most people have taught you about intelligence. I want to encourage the natural wisdom and creativity you’ve been connected to since you were young. I want to help you become a better thinker.
OK, not exactly a god. But something great. I want to help you think like a scientist, philosopher, doctor, mechanic, artist, poet, oracle, and more. All of these types of people have valuable, helpful ways of approaching thought. I want to help you be a chameleon who’s able to think like all of them.
But most of society will only teach you to think like one of them. You’ll end up with limited thinking and narrow focus. You’ll be able to tap into the super-intelligence of life only in certain fields or under certain conditions, and you’ll go back to ‘average’ thinking for the other areas of your life.
There’s better waiting for you.
You just have to admit that maybe you don’t understand intelligence as well as you used to think. You just have to admit that I might know what I’m talking about, and that it’s worth an experiment. You just have to let me teach you.
Understanding cures all fears. As a child, if you burn your hand on a stove, you may fear it for quite some time. But as you grow, and begin to understand electricity, appliances, heat, etc., you no longer fear the stove. Instead you use it for your own benefit.
Same thing goes for intelligence. If you understand it, it’s not a scary, mysterious thing. It’s not something to be avoided or dismissed. It’s not something to just believe society about. Instead…
…it becomes a powerful tool for your benefit.
This is why I love teaching so much. Because clarity empowers us all. It helps us ryze up to our greatest potential.
If you’re able to explain something well, you can be confident you understand it. If you stumble during your explanations, or can’t simplify the concept, you don’t really understand it. Hopefully I simplified some aspects of intelligence here. If I did, it’s a good sign that I understand what I’m talking about. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter if you believe in Howard Gardner’s 8 intelligences. It doesn’t matter if you believe g is the true measure of intelligence. It doesn’t even matter if you believe me. What matters is that you understand intelligence is something you can personally experience, something you can personally improve, and something you deserve to benefit from in your life. And regardless of whether I was off on a detail here or there, my main teaching is quite solid, and all about helping you tap into it.
For example…
I’ve helped Cynthia go from understanding almost nothing about life to controlling her own destiny. And although untested, has jumped many IQ points since we’ve met.
She’s 180’d on thousands of beliefs and shed countless pieces of societal conditioning.
I’ve helped her transform her beliefs, improve her mood, and refine her focus quickly.
And I can do the same for you.
Cyn wouldn’t be considered a ‘genius’ yet, but for someone who spent decades not understanding much about life, she’s made stunning improvements. And they continue.
There’s many beliefs to work on if you want more intelligence in your life.
Things like:
And I know one key trick to change your beliefs, fast.
I call it a Belief-Wheel.
It’s a simple exercise and all it takes is a pen and paper (or a blank document), and you. It can be done in under ten minutes without much effort.
But it still takes practice. It still requires you to make a change in your routine. It still means you have to sit down and actually do it.
To me, it’s a simple choice.
Do you close this browser window and go back to your normal life of average thinking? Or do you make a new decision, change things, and start blazing a trail towards your own true genius?
Do you let yourself get sucked into the sea of mediocrity out there? Or do you dive into my belief-ladder exercise and head towards your dreams?
If what I’ve said here resonates with you, and you feel like you’re ready to improve your intelligence, I have two (completely free) options for you.
Increasing your intelligence is one thing. Increasing your respect from ‘average thinkers’ is a totally different one.
If you want to be seen and recognized as smart, don’t bother focusing on wisdom. You’re better off focusing on persuasion, charm, and ‘dumbing-down.’ Turn your views, speech, and wisdom into pithy soundbites and catchy quotables. The public will adore you and consider you smart.
Being smart is a blessing and a curse. So is the respect of the masses.
Be careful which you choose, and why.
But whatever you choose, know I wish you success.